The Landscape of Early 2025: Reasoning, Sovereignty, And the Rise of Agentic AI

Download Report

Abstract

In the first half of 2025, the AI ecosystem is being reshaped around two major forces: a new paradigm of performance and intensifying geopolitical competition. The traditional training-centric model advancement is shifting toward the Reasoning Model paradigm, which emphasizes deeper inference-time thinking, accelerated by innovations from OpenAI and DeepSeek. At the same time, competition for energy and infrastructure, the rise of Sovereign AI strategies, and the diversification of specialized frontier models are disrupting technological hegemony and industrial order. This report reviews the major events and developments from late 2024 to July 2025, providing guidance for understanding the emerging threats and opportunities faced by both companies and nations.

Chapter 1. The New Frontier: Reasoning Models and the Test-Time Compute Revolution

As of 2025, AI development is moving away from a capital-heavy train-time compute paradigm toward test-time compute, where more resources are allocated at inference to support deeper reasoning. Previously, frontier models demanded billions of dollars in training costs, but reasoning models like OpenAI’s o1 and DeepSeek’s R1 demonstrate that complex step-by-step problem solving can be achieved with smarter inference. While this introduces a new trilemma—balancing speed, cost, and reasoning depth—it signals a broader shift from resource dominance to algorithmic innovation as the core driver of progress.

Chapter 2. China’s Rise: DeepSeek Shock and China’s AI Trajectory

In January 2025, DeepSeek’s release of R1 and V3 shook the global AI market. The “DeepSeek Shock” was not just about cost reduction but about disrupting U.S.-centric dominance, proving that China had reached world-class status in software and algorithmic efficiency. By claiming GPT-4-level performance for only $5.6 million, DeepSeek forced the U.S. to respond with the $500 billion Stargate Project. Soon after, Zhipu AI and Baidu released competitive reasoning models, underscoring China’s strategy of efficiency and open-source accessibility as levers of geopolitical influence.

Chapter 3. The AI Infrastructure War: Power, Cooling, and Geopolitics

The AI race now extends to infrastructure sovereignty. Data centers are rapidly adopting liquid cooling and even turning to nuclear energy to meet power densities exceeding 250kW per rack. In this new context, energy sovereignty is becoming synonymous with AI sovereignty. NVIDIA is reinforcing dominance through its Blackwell Ultra and Rubin roadmap as part of an integrated “AI Factory” strategy, while AMD challenges with the MI400 series and its open-source ROCm stack. This underscores a new geopolitical reality: the AI race is increasingly defined by who controls energy and infrastructure at scale.

Chapter 4. The Silicon Engine: Accelerators, NPUs, and the Journey Toward Independence

The AI hardware market is expanding rapidly, with GPUs still dominant but constrained by memory bottlenecks, driving surging demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM). At the same time, NPUs are proliferating in smartphones, IoT, and vehicles, enabling edge AI adoption. NVIDIA strengthens its moat with full-stack “AI Factory” platforms, while AMD leverages cost and openness with the MI400 series and ROCm. Hyperscalers like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft pursue their own silicon for independence, though challenges highlight how difficult this path remains.

Chapter 5. The Rise of Sovereign AI: Age of Competition, National Strategies

Nations now regard AI as a strategic security asset. The U.S., U.K., France, Japan, and South Korea have each launched sovereign AI strategies to control domestic models, infrastructure, and data. The U.S. has invested via the Stargate Project, the U.K. through its Compute Roadmap, France via Mistral and nuclear-powered supercomputing, and Japan with its AI Promotion Act. South Korea has pledged ₩100 trillion to join the global top three in AI. These strategies highlight the sovereign AI trilemma—balancing autonomy, openness, and economic growth.

Chapter 6. Innovators: Startup Approaches and Big Tech Power Dynamics

Startups can no longer compete by simply building bigger models. Instead, they either scale up vertically, like Mistral with its sovereign AI cloud strategy, or specialize deeply, like Lablup with GPU virtualization. Meanwhile, Big Tech companies consolidate power—Microsoft with Copilot, Google with Gemini and A2A, Meta with open-source Llama 4, and Anthropic with Claude 4. The market dynamic reflects a divide: startups innovate at the edges, while Big Tech dominates ecosystems.

Chapter 7. The H1 2025 Frontier Model Landscape

The first half of 2025 saw rapid releases of frontier models including xAI’s Grok, Anthropic’s Claude 4, Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Meta’s Llama 4. The race has shifted from general-purpose supremacy toward domain specialization—Claude excels at coding, Gemini leads in multimodal and long-context tasks, and Grok shines in reasoning. With Llama 4 narrowing the performance gap, enterprises are adopting multi-model strategies tailored to use cases.

Chapter 8. The Proliferation of Coding AI: From Assistant to Autonomous Teammate

Coding AI has evolved beyond assistants into autonomous teammates. Tools like GitHub Copilot Agent and Devin can plan, implement, and test independently. Yet real-world studies show a productivity paradox—skilled developers sometimes slow down when relying on AI. Despite this, enterprise adoption is growing, with companies piloting large-scale deployments. The real challenge is designing effective human–AI collaboration models where AI serves as junior developers under human oversight.